Interpersonal communications chapter 11 flashcards quizlet. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63, 452459. Verbal aggressiveness and affective learning in physical. The factor analytic data replicate previous findings that the verbal aggressiveness scale measures two constructs, verbal aggressiveness and verbal benevolence communication style, and. Indicate how often each statement is true for you personally when you try to influence other persons.
Physical aggression, verbal aggression, guilt, condemnation of anger, and mistrust or suspicion. Infante and wigley concluded that their results indicate that the scale is valid and reliable p. Key concepts communibiology, genetics, traits, verbal aggression, temperment. Verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness are distinct but closely related. Reports on the development of a valid and reliable instrument to measure verbal aggressiveness. The dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale. This study examined the bestfitting factor structure for the verbal aggressiveness scale vas. Infante and wigley developed a trait measure of verbal aggressiveness.
The bussperry aggression questionnaire bpaq is a popular measure of aggression in adults. First, the study evaluates the reliability of selfreports of argumentativeness by comparing selfreported argumentativeness with two other reports of the same target. Verbal aggressiveness among physicians and trainees. Why onepoint increments lead to better decisions scores in the verbal reasoning and quantitative reasoning. The second scale instructed the subjects to rate each of the verbally aggressive.
The buss perry aggressiveness questionnaire was used for the data collection. The results identified types of messages used, beliefs about hurt and reasons for use which distinguish high from low verbal aggressives. According to the results, density could be a first indicator of verbal. The willingness to collaborate trait scale was created. Verbal aggressivenesscontinued verbal aggressiveness is an assault on anothers self concept, rather than hisher position. Implications are discussed, especially in terms of understanding and controlling physical aggression. The influence of nonsmokers argumentativeness and verbal. The dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale article pdf available in communication monographs 7. Mothers trait verbal aggressiveness as a predictor of. Two studies examining the error theory underlying the. A good deal of research on argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness has been conducted in the communication discipline in this and the previous decade. Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness as predictors of partnerperceptions of conflict styles during a simulated downsizing activity an extensive body of research has examined how the traits of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness function within organizations e. For example, aggressiveness may heighten feelings of anger or increase the probability of becoming angry. A multitraitmultimethod validity assessment of the verbal.
Speculations are advanced as to why high verbal aggressives are prone to using self. Verbal aggressiveness and leadership style of sports. Essential reading for listening researchers across a range of disciplines, the sourcebook of listening research. Verbal aggressiveness was chosen as a discriminant validity test. Thus, the current results do not provide a serious indictment of most previous studies scoring the vas as a 20item unidimensional scale. A rationale is developed for studying verbal aggression apart from other types of aggression, and several studies developing a verbal aggressiveness scale are. According to hamilton and hample, the hierarchical model of verbal aggressiveness proposes that the general trait of motivation to argue and verbal aggressiveness are secondorder factors exerting topdown influence on subsidiary motives and attitudes p. The vas has 20 items, 10 that are 10worded negativelyaggressively, and 10 worded positivelykindly.
Infante and wigleys 1986 verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a widely. The verbal aggressiveness scale measures the personality trait of verbal aggressiveness and has been widely used in communication research. Aggression, college students, communication research, higher education, interpersonal communication, measurement techniques, measures individuals, models, persuasive discourse, rating scales, self concept, speech. Physical, verbal, anger and hostility aggressiveness in. This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the verbal aggressiveness article. The measurement of aggressive communication predispositions. A series of followup studies used exploratory factor analysis to investigate the underlying structure of the ccs. The current authors published a series of studies showing that the. The caas demonstrated good internal consistency for both subscales and total scale score. Request pdf verbal aggressiveness scale vas the verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a 20item selfreport measure of the personality trait of verbal. Communication behavior is considered verbally aggressive. Participants were 6 undergraduate students who completed the compassion scale, prca24, hypersensitive narcissism scale, and the verbal aggressiveness scale. This article explores associations between mothers trait verbal aggressiveness va and maternal and child behavior during playtime interactions.
The 72 trainees received the ivas and demographic questions, whereas the attending physicians received additional questions regarding type of practice, career satisfaction, litigation, and. Verbal aggressiveness is the predisposition to attack the selfperception of others. Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and. Second, the study examines whether particular characteristics e. Data were analyzed using pearson productmoment correlations to examine the associations among the variables of interest and independentsample ttests to investigate sex differences. Verbal aggressiveness scale vas request pdf researchgate. Participants completed the 10 negatively worded items of the verbal aggressiveness scale to assess the level of verbal aggressiveness as well as a. Table means for the aggression questionnaire males n 612 males females n 641 females physical aggression i 24.
This is why it is very important that parents, teachers. Standardized questionnaires have been distributed to 168 students and 8 teachers at secondary schools in 2017. Definitions of personality, aggressive behavior, and provocation personality is defined as a dynamic organization, inside the person, of psychophysical systems that create the persons characteristic patterns of behavior, thoughts, and feelings p. Argumentativeness is a predisposition to recognize issues and advocate strongly for a position. The questionnaire is a selfreport scale consisting of 29 items answered on a 5point likert type scale. Argumentative and aggressive communication in relational. For more information view the sage journals sharing page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the articles subject put new text under old text.
The aim of the survey was to depict structures of verbal aggressiveness and interpersonal attractiveness hierarchies and to examine the factors affecting the position in these hierarchies, using a sample of university students and professors at physical education faculty as an illustration. Types of talk, verbal aggressiveness, communication climate 2 abstract significant research has investigated jack gibbs model of defensive and supportive communication, but little has explored the influence of the type of talk defensive or supportive on perceptions of communication climate and the role that verbal. Verbal aggressiveness scale vas the sourcebook of listening. The research has been based on a personality trait model that was used to conceptualize a very basic ideathat some aggressive behaviors are constructive and others are destructive.
Scale scores correlated with peer nominations of the various kinds of aggression. It involves physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger and hostility. Pages 245268 received 30 nov 2001, accepted 20 jun 2004, published online. Pdf infante and wigleys 1986 verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a widely accepted and frequently used measure of trait verbal aggression find, read. Theory, research, and application is the first text to describe the development, history, research, and application efforts on the communication traits of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. The sourcebook of listening research wiley online books. A rationale is developed for studying verbal aggression apart from other types of aggression, and several studies developing a verbal aggressiveness scale are reported. The instrumentation included the modified argumentativeness scale, the verbal aggressiveness scale, the nonsmoking compliancegaining scale, demographic and smoking questions. To address these problems,bussandperry1992streamlinedthebdhito create its successorthe bussperry aggression questionnaire bpaqby jettisoning several items and. Better by design the new verbal reasoning and quantitative. Pdf the dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale.
Verbal agressiveness is conceptualized as a personality trait that predisposes persons to attack the. Verbal aggressiveness, according to the communication handbook, can be defined as behavior designed to advance ones own goals without concern or regard for any harm done to others devito, 1986,p 9. Winner of the 2018 distinguished book award from the communication and social cognition division of the national communication association. This paper examines a common manifestation of such negative conduct, verbal aggression, and proposes an approach to avoiding, or at least minimizing, its negative effects in mediation. The infante verbal aggressiveness scale ivas was administered as part of a survey to 48 medical students, 24 residents, and 257 attending physicians. The following table contains information and references for self and teacher report measures of aggressive behavior. Further, the model suggests that the vas measures two separate tendencies. The first study used qualitative data to identify and develop initial scale items. Managing verbal and physical aggression course overview the scope of aggression at work ripples out like a pebble on a lake, from seemingly insignificant instances of verbal aggression to shockingly violent physical incidents.
Summary the verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a 20. The verbal aggressiveness scale this survey is concerned with how we try to get people to comply with our wishes. The sample of the study consisted of 168 athletes 95 boys and 73 girls, 15 19 years old m 16. The construct validity of infante and wigleys verbal aggressiveness scale and infante and rancers argumentativeness scale are assessed with confirmatory factor analysis and multitraitmultimethod analysis. The purpose of this dissertation was to develop a compassionate communication scale ccs by conducting a series of studies. This study is aiming at examining 1 physical education teachers selfperceived verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness, 2 students perceptions about verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness developed by their teachers, in order to assess the communicational accordance between students and teachers perceptions in elementary, junior and high schools. Men show a higher level of aggression than women archer, 2004. The results are discussed in terms of understanding the nature of trait verbal aggressiveness. Scale reliability was demonstrated through analysis of internal consistency of the item scale. Anger and aggressiveness were moderately correlated, suggesting that they may be interrelated. The prca was chosen because the mtercuitural and mterethnic contexts were expected tocorre1ate with the four contexts represented m the prca.
In this study, relations among physical education instructors verbal aggressiveness were examined as perceived by students and students affective learning. A communication trait model predictive of trait willingness to collaborate was tested using 401 questionnaires completed by 201 communication students each of whom recruited one other. Results indicate that the scale is valid and reliable. Effects of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness on. Verbal aggressiveness is viewed a negative attribute within groups. Forty mothers completed a 10minute play period with one of their children range 38 years and then responded to d. A median split was used to dichotomize both argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness into. Expression of anger, disregard for rights, verbal aggressiveness, physical aggressiveness, passive aggressiveness, general assertiveness, selfconfidence. Infante and charles j w wigley iii, published on 010107. The relationship between trait verbal aggressiveness and teacher. The mediation process involves the risk that participants have greater freedom to engage in combative, hostile, facetoface conduct than normally would be the case in adjudication. Avtgis include a collection of nine widely used reliable and. The development of a short scale measuring aggressiveness.
Aim of this study is to detect structures of verbal aggressiveness network and also reveal changes through time. Individuals who rely on verbal aggressiveness are viewed as less credible, have less satisfying relationships, and resort to physical aggression more often. These findings suggest the need to assess not only overall aggression but also its individual components. Click here to start a new topic please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes new to wikipedia. Accurately interpreting correlations between the vas and other variables, however, requires an examination of. The total score for aggression is the sum of the factor scores. Article information, pdf download for verbal aggressiveness. Start studying interpersonal communications chapter 11. Dynamic analysis of verbal aggressiveness networks in school. We performed complete social networks analysis and further processing by conventional statistics. Exploration of verbal aggressiveness and interpersonal. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Methodology and measures is a landmark publication that defines the field of listening research and its best practices.